Impact of fiscal consolidation on debt levels

In recent years, I’ve frequently stated that fiscal consolidation can actually increase debt levels. It may seem a paradox because fiscal consolidation aims to reduce the budget deficit by increasing taxes and cutting spending. Yet, under circumstances, policies to reduce debt levels can actually cause a rise in debt to GDP. This seems to be …

Read more

The bizarre logic of deficit reduction increasing UK growth

The Prime Minister has got into a bit of pickle by trying to maintain the view that deficit reduction policies have not reduced economic growth, and in fact have had the opposite effect.

“They (are) absolutely clear that the deficit reduction plan is not responsible (for low growth); in fact, quite the opposite.” (link)

There is an economic logic to arguing that given the size of  the UK budget deficit, the government need to consider policies to reduce it. Economists will disagree over the timing of deficit reduction. Some economists argue that the deficit shouldn’t be reduced whilst we are still in a recession. Others may argue, we have no luxury of waiting.

I favour the former view that recovery should come before austerity. But, I can at least understand the argument that we should cut the deficit now. However, what I can’t understand is the belief that if you cut public spending in the middle of a recession, that it will have not have some negative impact on economic growth – and in fact spending cuts will have the opposite effect in boosting economic growth. It is really a bizarre logic to hope that cutting spending at the present time will increase economic growth. With falling output, falling construction output  there is no evidence of any ‘crowding in’ in the UK economy. There is however plenty of alternative evidence, e.g. IMF reports, that austerity has caused a negative multiplier effect and reduced growth.

I wonder if there are any economists who really believe that cutting government spending during a period of private sector deleveraging will actually increase economic growth? If David Cameron wrote an A-level essay on ‘discuss the impact of a fall in government spending’ – he would really struggle to get an E grade, and would probably fail.

Has the UK responded to news of public sector wage freezes and lower government spending by rejoicing at the planned reduction in the budget deficit and gone on a spending spree to celebrate?

UK consumer confidence

The impact on confidence has been the opposite. Relatively minor spending cuts have created pessimistic expectations. There has been no confidence fairy miracle. As you would expect spending cuts in an already depressed economy have further reduced real GDP.

Read more

Universal Credit – how it works and criticisms

Universal credit is a new means-tested benefit, which, in October 2013, will replace several different means-tested benefits, such as: income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance income-related Employment and Support Allowance Income Support Child Tax Credits Working Tax Credits Housing Benefit. The aim of universal credit is to provide a simplified means-tested benefits system, which provides income to those …

Read more

RPIJ – a new inflation measure

For those who like to keep track of the myriad different rates of inflation, the ONS will shortly be publishing a new measure – RPIJ.

  • RPIJ will be basically RPI, but calculated in the same way as CPI which uses a geometric mean.
  • CPI = official household inflation measure (CPI) – calculated using a geometric mean.
  • RPI = CPI + Mortgage interest payments and council tax. RPI is also calculated using an arithmetic mean. (The RPI doesn’t mean international standards for calculating inflation.)

gap-between-rpi-cpi

RPI is traditionally higher than CPI. The DWF state since its introduction in 1988, the RPI has averaged 0.73% more than the CPI which is mainly attributable to the “formula effect”. Some argue, because of the way it is being calculated, the RPI is over-estimating inflation. However, with pensions often linked to RPI, changing the way it is calculated could lead to lower annual increases in pensions. Therefore, the decision was taken to introduce a new measure RPIJ and keep the old measure RPI going.

Read more

Italy hopes to leave austerity behind

After a rather lengthy post on evaluating EU fiscal rules, a more immediate and simple political criticism of the EU’s general austerity policies from Mr Bersani of the Italian Democrats (Pd). The new Italian political leader has argued: “We must leave the austerity cage,” “A change of course is absolutely necessary given that five years …

Read more

EU Fiscal rules – economic issues and problems

In 2012, the EU introduced a new form of its growth and stability pact. The main rules for EU fiscal policy are:

  • Total Government debt must not be more than 60% of gross domestic product;
  • The Government deficit must not be more than 3% of GDP except in particular circumstances.

Excessive Deficit Procedure EDP

If a country breaches these rules, it becomes subject to the Excessive Deficit Procedure EDP. This means that the country in question is subject to EU surveillance and must comply with EU decisions on how to deal with the high debt. The country then has to meet medium term budget requirements to reduce deficits. If countries fail to make satisfactory progress, they can be given financial penalties, (‘e.g. an interest-bearing deposit of 0.2% of GDP will be imposed on non-compliant euro-area countries’.)

Countries undergoing EDP

Currently 23 out of 27 EU countries are considered to have excessive debt and are subject to EDP.

For example, Ireland has been given until  2015 to meet the deficit requirement of 3% of GDP.   Ireland has until 2018 to meet the debt requirement of 60% of GDP. (Current EU rules)

 

Reasons for Fiscal Rules

  1. Overcoming political resistance to spending cuts. Politicians often have an incentive to allow higher short term budget deficits and ignore the long-term consequences. Fiscal rules put pressure on governments to stick to fiscal responsibility. The EU would say the constitutional fiscal rules reduce the political cost of unpopular decisions.
  2. Lower bond yields. In 2010-12, the Eurozone was hurt by rising bond yields, as markets feared the liquidity of Eurozone nations. If countries stick to fiscal rules, markets will have more confidence that borrowing will be sustainable and the Eurozone will not see the expensive rise in bond yields, which increase the cost of interest payments.
  3. Single currency makes fiscal rules more important. Countries in the Eurozone cannot rely on an independent Central Bank to print money and buy bonds, therefore fiscal responsibility becomes more important. Some argue these fiscal rules are the first step towards fiscal union.

Problems with Implementing fiscal rules

  • Most countries are exceeding these fiscal rules, and to comply with the rules, European governments have had to adopt strict austerity measures to try and achieve the target. This involves cutting government spending and increasing taxes. The consequence of this deflationary policy aiming at deficit reduction has been to cause lower economic growth and rising unemployment.
  • Lack of alternative policies. Countries pursuing fiscal austerity, in the Euro, have not been able to adopt other macro-economic policies to stimulate demand. Eurozone countries have not been able to devalue or promote expansionary monetary policy. Therefore, there are several factors reducing demand all at once. A country like the UK, at least as its own monetary policy to offer some stimulus.

    Read more

Bank of England criticisms

Recently, the Economist published an article (You can fool some of the people…), pointing out several economic commentators were increasingly critical of UK economic policy and the Bank of England’s monetary policy in particular. Is the Bank of England really losing grip of monetary policy? or are they doing the best job in difficult circumstances?

Criticism of the Bank of England Monetary Policy

1. Inflation above target

cpi-inflation

The Bank of England have been given an inflation target of CPI 2% +/-1. Yet in the past five years, inflation has rarely been below the target. Inflation has frequently been higher than forecasts, and the Bank seem willing to tolerate a higher rate of inflation. In a recent article, David Smith writes:

“It (the B of E)  has rarely hit the 2% inflation target in the past eight years and, on its own forecasts will not do so in the next 2-3 years. A decade of above-target inflation is, for any central bank, flaky. The Bank has lost its compass.” (the Bank of England has lost its compass)

The Economist also worries about the persistence of missing the inflation target.

“This time, however, the Bank thinks inflation will be above target throughout the two-year forecast period. That will equate to more than five years of missed targets or, as the Bank euphemistically puts it, a temporary, albeit protracted, period of above-target inflation. (Dear Joanna, be flexible)

2. Depreciation in Sterling

Despite the threat of above target inflation, the Bank has been quite sanguine about letting the Pound depreciate. The Bank of England have given the impression that a depreciation is necessary to restore the balance of the economy – improve the current account and increase exports. But, as noted, the depreciation in the Pound has given disappointing returns. For the depreciation, we risk more inflation and a decline in living standards.

3. Quantitative easing.

As a percentage of GDP, the UK has one of the largest programs of quantitative easing in the world. However, the Bank has no clear exit strategy, and some fear that we risk a bond bubble (rising bond yields), when we reverse the policy; it could leave the UK struggling to sell sufficient gilts to finance the large budget deficits.

In Defence of the Bank of England

1. Inflation in not the major problem

economic-growth-uk-ons-quarter

The UK has experienced a longer and deeper decline in GDP than the great depression. The UK looks to be heading to a triple dip recession. This shows that the economy is experiencing an unprecedented situation of depressed demand. Given fiscal tightening, weak global growth and very weak bank lending, the Bank of England should be pursuing monetary easing. To worry about inflation being slightly above target, during this prolonged recession would be to ignore the Bank’s dual mandate of inflation and economic growth. Even if they didn’t have a dual mandate, common sense suggests the monetary authorities should  try to stimulate demand when you are experiencing a stagnating economy.

2. The inflation target is symmetrical – 1-3% not less than 2%

Some commentators have criticised the Bank for not keeping inflation below a target of 2%, but this ignores the fact the Bank of England have a target of 2% +/-1. Even by the strict criteria of inflation targeting, the Bank are targeting an inflation rate of 1-3%. It is true the ECB have an inflation target of less than 2%, but the performance of the EU economy doesn’t justify the UK suddenly adopting a stricter approach to inflation.

Read more

Fuel Consumption in UK

In the post-war period, consumption of  vehicle fuel (petrol / diesel) increased dramatically as car ownership rose and more journeys were made by car. However, since 2007, there has been a significant drop in vehicle fuel consumption, with demand falling over 20%

Many factors affect demand for vehicle fuel, including price, income, fuel efficiency, quality of alternatives (public transport) and general preferences.

consumption-of-fuel

If we ignore all the income effects, social effects and changes in consumer preferences (which admittedly is very significant) we can make a very rough estimate at the price elasticity of demand for vehicle fuel.

Between Q3 2002 and Q3 2012 households consumption of vehicle fuel fell by 18% per head. During this period the annual per litre price of petrol increased 85% and diesel  88%.  Department of Energy and Climate Change

This gives a (very rough) PED for petrol of  (-18/85) = – 0.21

It is what we would expect – demand for vehicle fuel is price inelastic, but higher prices do reduce demand somewhat.

Factors affecting demand for fuel

Cost of Fuel

Due to rising costs of fuel, households are still spending more on fuel. In 2002, we spent £89 per head on fuel. In 2012, this had increased to £129. Given the rise in the fuel burden, it is not surprising people have sought to reduce consumption. (see: fuel poverty)

Income effects

The graph shows that air fuel is much more sensitive to income effects. During the start of the recession from 2007 to 2009, demand for airline fell almost 30% in a short space of time. This indicates that airline fuel is income elastic – sensitive to changes in income. Airline fuel has not really recovered from 2009. The recession will also be having an impact on demand for petrol. The biggest decline for vehicle fuel has occurred during this period. Faced with rising prices and squeezed real wages, people have been cutting back on vehicle fuel. When the economy recovers, we can expect a renewed increase in demand for vehicle fuel.

Read more

Item added to cart.
0 items - £0.00